PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
HTML (Español (España))
XML (Español (España))
This journal is licensed by a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International. For the CC licenses, the principle isthe creative freedom. This system complements the copyright without opposing it, conscious of its importance in our culture. The content of the articles is the responsibility of each author, and does not compromise in any way, to the journal or the university. It allows the transmission and reproduction of titles, abstracts and full content, with academic, scientific, cultural ends, provided acknowledgment of the respective source. This work cannot be used for commercial purposes.
They journal does not charge authors for submission or publication.
Abstract
This research analyzes efficiency and explanatory management factors in the municipalities of Meta (Colombia) for the period 2010-2014. In order to provide a global and complementary view, an analysis was performed based on the efficiency estimated by the DNP (National Planning Department) for the period 2006-2014. The study used the methodology of data envelopment analysis (DEA), with an intertemporal border; results reveal that the efficiency levels achieved in various sectors related to municipal activities were 81.3 % and 49.7 % in education; 66.6 % in health; and 52.8 % and 62.2 % in water. These efficiency levels show that, on average, the analyzed municipalities could be able to improve the management of their inputs. A more detailed analysis showed that 16 municipalities (29.6 %) are above the average efficiency level in education; 10 municipalities (18.5 %) in health; and 13 municipalities (24 %) in water. The most important explanatory factors for efficiency have been investment in relation to population in any of the studied activities (education, health, and water), as well as the characteristics of the region to which the municipalities belong, in terms of population, area or altitude.
References
Afonso, A. y Fernandes, S. (2005). Assessing and explaining the relative efficiency of local government. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5), 1946-1979.
Afonso, A. y Venancio, A. (2016). The relevance of commuting zones for regional spending efficiency. Applied Economics, 48(10), 865-877.
Athanassopoulos, A. D. (1998). Decision support for target-based resource allocation of public services in multiunit and multilevel systems. Management Science, 44(2), 173-189.
Balaguer-Coll, M. T, Prior, D. y Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2013). Output complexity, environmental conditions, and the efficiency of municipalities. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 39, 303-324.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. y Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. y Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operation Research, 2(6), 429-444.
Cordero, J. M., Pedraja-Chaparro, F., Pisaflores, E. C. y Polo, C. (2017). Efficiency assessment of Portuguese municipalities using a conditional nonparametric approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 48, 1-24.
Da Cruz, N. F. y Marques, R. C. (2014). Revisiting the determinants of local governments performance. Omega, 44, 91-103.
De Borger, B. y Kerstens, K. (1996). Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: a comparative analysis of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, 145-170.
D'Inverno, G., Carosi, L. y Ravagli, L. (2018). Global public spending efficiency in Tuscan municipalities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 102-113.
De Borger, B. y Kerstens, K. (2000). What is known about municipal efficiency? The Belgian case and beyond. En J. L. Blank (Ed.), Public provision and performance: Contributions from efficiency and productivity measurement (pp. 299-330). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Distexhe, V. (1993). Lefficacite productive des services d' enlevement des immondices en Wallonie. Cahiers Economiques de Bruxelles, 137, 119-138.
Drake, L. y Simper, R. (2003). The measurement of English and Welsh police force efficiency: A comparison of distance function models. European Journal Operation Research, 147(1), 165-186.
El-Mahgary, S. y Lahdelma, R. (1995). Data envelopment analysis: visualizing the results. European Journal Operation Research, 83(3), 700-710.
Freíd, H. O. y Klein, J. D. (1999). Efficiencies in United States metropolitan areas. En J. L. Blank (Ed.), Public provision and performance. Contributions efficiency and productivity measurement. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Karlaftis, M. G. (2004). A DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of urban transit systems. European Journal Operation Research, 152(2), 354-364.
Municipios.com.co (s. f.). Municipios de Meta. Recuperado de http://www.municipios.com.co/municipios
Nijkamp, P y Suzuki, S. (2009). A generalized goals-achievement model in data envelopment analysis: An application to efficiency improvement in local government finance in Japan. Spatial Economic Analysis, 4(3), 249-274.
Osborne, S. IP (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377-387.
Pina, V. y Torres, L. (2001). Analysis of the efficiency of local government services delivering. An application to public urban transport. Transportation Research, parte A, 35, 929-944.
Prado, J. M. y García-Sanchez, I. M. (2007). Efficiency evaluation in municipal services: An application to the street lighting service in Spain. Journal Productivity Analysis, 27, 149-162.
Prieto, A. M. y Zofio, J. L. (2001). Evaluating effectiveness in public provision of infrastructure and equipment: the case of Spanish municipalities. Journal Productivity Analysis, i5(1), 41-58.
Quah, D. T (1993a). Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. European Economic Review, 37, 426-434.
Quah, D. T (1993b). Galton's fallacy and Test of the Convergence Hypotheses. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95, 427-443.
Quah, D. T (1996). Twin peaks: Growth and convergence in models of distribution dynamics. The Economic Journal, 106, 1045-1055.
Quah, D. T (1997). Empirics for growth and distribution: Stratification, polarization and convergence clubs. Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 27-59.
Scott, W. D. (1992). Multivariate density estimation: Theory, practice, and visualization. The Annals of Statistics, 20, 1236-1265.
Sheather, W. y Jones, M. (1991). A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for Kernel density estimation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, serie B, 53 (3), 683-690.
Stokey, N. L. y Lucas, R. E. (1989). Recursive methods in economic dynamics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tairou, A. (2000). Does inefficiency explain financial vulnerability of French municipalities? En International Conference on Accounting, Auditing and Management in Public Sector Reforms. Saragossa: EIASM.
Tulkens, H. y Van den Eeckaut, P (1995). Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: Methodological aspects. European Journal of Operational Research, 80(3), 474-499.
Tupper, H. C. y Resende, M. (2004). Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector: an empirical study. Utility Policy, 12, 29-40.
Vilardell, I. (1989). Leficiencia en l'actuació de les administracions municipals: una evaluacion del servei de recollida de residus sólids urbans. Revista Económica de Catalunya, 11, 19-33.
Worthington, A. C. (2000). Cost efficiency in Australian local government: a comparative analysis of mathematical programming and econometric approaches. Financial Accountability and Management, 16(3), 201-221.
Worthington, A. C. y Dollery, B. E. (2000). An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in local government. Local Government Studies, 26(2), 23-52.
Reference by
