PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
This journal is licensed by a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International. For the CC licenses, the principle isthe creative freedom. This system complements the copyright without opposing it, conscious of its importance in our culture. The content of the articles is the responsibility of each author, and does not compromise in any way, to the journal or the university. It allows the transmission and reproduction of titles, abstracts and full content, with academic, scientific, cultural ends, provided acknowledgment of the respective source. This work cannot be used for commercial purposes.
They journal does not charge authors for submission or publication.
Abstract
One of the questions raised by some academics and researchers, economists and economic policy makers of different governments today is what criteria should we use to share benefits from economic growth, driven by increases in the productivity of production factors? This has led governments in different regions to set agendas of integration and to adopt economic policies that have affected both, the economy and the population in terms of equity and justice. Clavijo (2003) distinguishes three important moments in the issue of productivity in Colombia. The first one in June 1988 and in charge of the administration of Virgilio Barco laid the foundations for the economic aperture. A second momentum was in the administration of César Gaviria, in the mid 1990’s, which accelerated the process of trade liberalization, was characterized by an increased free import regime and thus a reduction of protectionist policies, which was evidenced by clearing the import surcharge. The third stage occurred in the administration of Ernesto Samper, where the subject of trade openness was replaced by the Social Pact, inspired in the wage and income policies, applied in the U.S.A. in the seventies, and in Mexico in the eighties. At that time, a Presidential Commission was created in order to reconcile the wage issues in regards to productivity.
Keywords:
References
Arango, L., Posada, E. y Uribe, J. (2004, julio). Cambios en la estructura de los salarios urbanos en Colombia (1984 – 2000). Borradores de Economía, 297, 1-18. Recuperado de http://www.banrep.gov.co/docum/ftp/borra297.pdf
Clavijo, S. (2003, enero). Crecimiento productividad y la “nueva economía”: implicaciones para Colombia. Borradores de Economía, 228, 1-37. Recuperado de http://www.banrep.gov.co/es/borrador-228
Colombia, Congreso de Colombia (1990). Ley 50 de 1990, “Por la cual se introducen reformas al Código Sustantivo del Trabajo y se dictan otras disposiciones”. Bogotá.
Colombia, Congreso de Colombia (2002). Ley 789 de 2002, “Por la cual se dictan normas para apoyar el empleo y ampliar la protección social y se modifican algunos artículos del código sustantivo de trabajo”. Bogotá.
Colombia, Congreso de Colombia (2003). Ley 797 de 2003, “Por la cual se reforman algunas disposiciones del sistema general de pensiones previsto en la Ley 100 de 1993 y se adoptan disposiciones sobre los Regímenes Pensionales exceptuados y especiales”. Bogotá.
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (Cepal) (2012). Anuario Estadístico de América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.
Departamento Nacional de Planeación (DNP) (2008). Documento CONPES 3527. Política nacional de competitividad y productividad. Bogotá: Ministerio de Comercio, Industria y Turismo.
Echevarría, J., Arbeláez, M. y Rosales, M. (2006, febrero). La productividad y sus determinantes: el caso de la industria colombiana. Borradores de Economía, 374, 1-36. Recuperado de http://www.banrep.gov.co/docum/ftp/borra374.pdf
Plataforma colombiana de derechos humanos, democracia y desarrollo y secretaría técnica corporación cactus. (2010). Informe Alterno al Quinto Informe del Estado Colombiano ante el Comité de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales. Bogotá: Gente Nueva Editorial.
Reference by
