This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed by a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International. For the CC licenses, the principle isthe creative freedom. This system complements the copyright without opposing it, conscious of its importance in our culture. The content of the articles is the responsibility of each author, and does not compromise in any way, to the journal or the university. It allows the transmission and reproduction of titles, abstracts and full content, with academic, scientific, cultural ends, provided acknowledgment of the respective source. This work cannot be used for commercial purposes.
They journal does not charge authors for submission or publication.
Abstract
This study examines the theoretical foundations of creative ecosystems within the context of intangible cultural heritage. Through a comprehensive literature review,
the research analyzes the scientific production in terms of publication year, country, document types, and thematic areas, utilizing Scopus database and the Tree of Science
content analysis technique. The findings highlight the significance of valuation methods, decision-making processes, and policy development, emphasizing the need to incorporate additional values and identify key actors in this field. These insights provide a contemporary perspective and serve as a robust foundation for future research, fostering knowledge advancement at the intersection of creative ecosystems and intangible cultural heritage.
Keywords:
References
Arias, E. J., Valle, J. L., & Caro, J. E. (2018). Los negocios de la música vallenata y el desarrollo empresarial de Valledupar. Teknos Revista Científica, 80–88. https://doi.org/10.25044/25392190.944
Azevedo, A. (2021). Using social media photos as a proxy to estimate the recreational value of (im)movable heritage: The Rubjerg Knude (Denmark) lighthouse. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(6), 2283–2303.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2020-0365
Benavente, J. M., & Grazzi, M. (2017). Políticas públicas para la creatividad y la innovación: Impulsando la economía naranja en América Latina y el Caribe. In Banco interamericano de desarrollo BID [Estudio que desarrolla el concepto de ecosistema creativo y otros aspectos de la economía creativa]. Banco interamericano de desarrollo BID. https://doi.org/10.18235/0000841
Bendassolli, P. F., Wood Jr., T., Kirschbaum, C., & Cunha, M. P. e. (2009). Indústrias criativas: definição, limites e possibilidades. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 49(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902009000100003
Blicharska, M., Smithers, R. J., Hedblom, M., Hedenås, H., Mikusiński, G., Pedersen, E., Sandström, P., & Svensson, J. (2017). Shades of grey challenge practical application of the cultural ecosystem services concept. Ecosystem Services, 23(June 2016), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.014
Carvalho, N., Chaim, O., Cazarini, E., & Gerolamo, M. (2018). Manufacturing in the fourth industrial revolution: A positive prospect in Sustainable Manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing, 21, 671–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.170
Chadegani, A. A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of science and Scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18
Chowdhury, K., & Behera, B. (2021). Traditional water bodies and cultural ecosystem services: Experiences from rural West Bengal, India. World Development Perspectives, 24(August), 100372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2021.100372
Colavitti, A. M., Usai, A., & Serra, S. (2018). Towards an integrated assessment of the cultural ecosystem services in the policy-making for urban ecosystems: Lessons from the spatial and economic planning for landscape and cultural heritage in Tuscany and
Apulia (IT). Planning Practice & Research, 33(4), 441–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2018.1510275
Csurgó, B., & Smith, M. K. (2021). The value of cultural ecosystem services in a rural landscape context. Journal of Rural Studies, 86, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.030
Dameri, R. P., & Demartini, P. (2020). Knowledge transfer and translation in cultural ecosystems. Management Decision, 58(9), 1885–1907. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2019-1505
Díaz, B. E. (2015). Dirección estratégica en ciudades y territorios creativos: diseño de un modelo de innovación y creatividad en red de ámbito nacional [Tesis doctoral, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos]. https://eciencia.urjc.es/handle/10115/13706
Díaz, C. M., & Vélez, P. (2021). Aportes de la conectividad cerebral a la comprensión y el diagnóstico de la enfermedad mental. Neurología, Neurocirugía y Psiquiatría, 49(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.35366/101749
Duque, P., & Cervantes, L.-S. (2019). Responsabilidad social universitaria: una revisión sistemática y análisis bibliométrico. Estudios Gerenciales, 35(153), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2019.153.3389
Duque, P., Meza, O. E., Giraldo, D., & Barreto, K. (2021). Economía social y economía solidaria: un análisis bibliométrico y revisión de literatura. REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 138, e75566. https://doi.org/10.5209/reve.75566
Echchakoui, S. (2020). Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 8(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9
Eliasson, I., Knez, I., & Fredholm, S. (2018). Heritage planning in practice and the role of cultural ecosystem services. Heritage & Society, 11(1), 44–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2019.1576428
Elsevier. (2020). Content Coverage Guide. In Scopus (pp. 1–24). https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/69451/Scopus_ContentCoverage_Guide_WEB.pdf (Accessed on 22 July 2021)
Espinosa, M. G. (2016). Visión 2030, estrategias y gestión para la conservación del patrimonio arqueológico en México [Tesis doctoral, Universitat de Barcelona]. http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/handle/2445/105510
Fish, R., Church, A., & Winter, M. (2016). Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosystem Services, 21(September), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002
Fundación ILAM. (2016). Concepto de patrimonio cultural. https://ilamdir.org/patrimonio/cultural
Gasparin, M., & Quinn, M. (2021). Designing regional innovation systems in transitional economies: A creative ecosystem approach. Growth and Change, 52(2), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12441
Ghermandi, A. (2018). Integrating social media analysis and revealed preference methods to value the recreation services of ecologically engineered wetlands. Ecosystem Services, 31, 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.012
Ghermandi, A., & Camacho, V. (2019). Mapping the cultural services of ecosystems and heritage sites in the Usumacinta floodplain in Mexico. In Mainstreaming Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services into Development Policy (pp. 104–120). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315531212-5
Ghermandi, A., Camacho, V., & Trejo, H. (2020). Social media-based analysis of cultural ecosystem services and heritage tourism in a coastal region of Mexico. Tourism Management, 77(September 2019), 104002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104002
Hølleland, H., Skrede, J., & Holmgaard, S. B. (2017). Cultural heritage and ecosystem services: A literature review. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 19(3), 210–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13505033.2017.1342069
Ichumbaki, E. B., & Pollard, E. (2019). Valuing the swahili cultural heritage: A maritime cultural ecosystem services study from Kilwa, Tanzania. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 21(4), 230–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13505033.2020.1794344
Langemeyer, J., Calcagni, F., & Baró, F. (2018). Mapping the intangible: Using geolocated social media data to examine landscape aesthetics. Land Use Policy, 77(May), 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.049
Lenzerini, F. (2011). Intangible cultural heritage: The living culture of peoples. European Journal of International Law, 22(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr006
Mengi, O., Bilandzic, A., Foth, M., & Guaralda, M. (2020). Mapping brisbane’s casual creative corridor: Land use and policy implications of a new genre in urban creative ecosystems. Land Use Policy, 97, 104792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104792
Milcu, A. I., Hanspach, J., Abson, D., & Fischer, J. (2013). Cultural ecosystem services: A literature review and prospects for future research. Ecology and Society, 18(3), art44. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05790-180344
Murciano, M., & González, C. (2018). Las industrias culturales y creativas en las comunidades autónomas españolas: El caso Cataluña. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 73, 146–167. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2018-1250
Navarro, S. (2014). Manifestaciones culturales e identidad en el Caribe colombiano: estudio de caso Carnaval y artesanía [Tesis doctoral, Universitat de Barcelona]. http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/handle/2445/55992
Oteros, E., Martín, B., Fagerholm, N., Bieling, C., & Plieninger, T. (2018). Using social media photos to explore the relation between cultural ecosystem services and landscape features across five European sites. Ecological Indicators, 94, 74–86.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.009
Podestá, M. P., Hernández, M. C., & Bedoya, B. E. (2020). Haciendo florecer el ecosistema. Análisis del apoyo a las industrias culturales y creativas en Colombia y el mundo. Economía Creativa, 13, 36–67. https://doi.org/10.46840/ec.2020.13.03
República de Colombia - Ministerio de Cultura. (2018). Caja de Herramientas - Grupo de Emprendimiento (1st ed.). República de Colombia - Ministerio de Cultura. https://economianaranja.gov.co/media/qmrjjc3t/caja-de-herramientas-grupo-emprendimiento.pdf
Richards, D. R., & Friess, D. A. (2015). A rapid indicator of cultural ecosystem service usage at a fine spatial scale: Content analysis of social media photographs. Ecological Indicators, 53, 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.034
Richards, D. R., & Tunçer, B. (2018). Using image recognition to automate assessment of cultural ecosystem services from social media photographs. Ecosystem Services, 31, 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.004
Ruggles, D. F., & Silverman, H. (2009). From tangible to intangible heritage. In Intangible Heritage Embodied (pp. 1–14). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0072-2_1
Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., Bhavnani, S., & Nail‐Chiwetalu, B. (2006). Use of information‐seeking strategies for developing systematic reviews and engaging in evidence‐based practice: the application of traditional and comprehensive Pearl Growing. A review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820600742190
Servais, A., Uribe, C., García, F., Maldonado, L., González, L., Usuga, L. M., Charpenel, P., & Trujillo, P. (2019). Ecosistemas creativos (2nd ed.). Conexiones creativas. https://cccreativas.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Ecosistemas-Creativos-2_Conexiones-Creativas.pdf
Shukla, A. K., Janmaijaya, M., Abraham, A., & Muhuri, P. K. (2019). Engineering applications of artificial intelligence: A bibliometric analysis of 30 years (1988–2018). Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 85, 517–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.06.010
Soler, M. I., & Mármol, R. (2018). Arte, tecnología y humanismo. El laboratorio de diseño social Studio Roosegaarde como ecosistema creativo tecnopoético. Artnodes, 21, 190–201. https://doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i21.2968
Tejedor, J. M. (2008). Economía de la cultura en los museos de la UPTC: El caso del museo casa cultural Gustavo Rojas Pinilla 2004-2005. Revista Apuntes Del CENES, 27(45), 269–291. https://doi.org/http://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/cenes/article/view/3094
Tengberg, A., Fredholm, S., Eliasson, I., Knez, I., Saltzman, K., & Wetterberg, O. (2012). Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: Assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosystem Services, 2, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006
Tenkanen, H., Di Minin, E., Heikinheimo, V., Hausmann, A., Herbst, M., Kajala, L., & Toivonen, T. (2017). Instagram, Flickr, or Twitter: Assessing the usability of social media data for visitor monitoring in protected areas. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 17615. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18007-4
UNESCO. (2003). Convención para la salvaguarda del patrimonio inmaterial [Reunión UNESCO, n. 32]. UNESCO.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000132540_spa
UNESCO. (2018). Comunicación. Manual Metodológico: indicadores UNESCO de cultura para el desarrollo. Manual Metodológico, 1–118.
http://es.unesco.org/creativity/sites/creativity/files/digital-library/IUCDManualMetodologico.pdf
Valencia, D. S., Robledo, S., Pinilla, R., Duque, N. D., & Olivar, G. (2020). SAP algorithm for citation analysis: An improvement to tree of science. Ingeniería e Investigación, 40(1), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v40n1.77718
Vecco, M. (2010). A definition of cultural heritage: From the tangible to the intangible. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11(3), 321–324.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2010.01.006
Zhang, Y., Lee, T. J., & Xiong, Y. (2022). The contribution of animal-based cultural ecosystem services to tourist well-being at cultural heritage sites. Journal of Travel Research, 61(7), 1631–1647. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211037743
Zhou, J., Wang, W., Zhou, J., Zhang, Z., Lu, Z., & Gong, Z. (2022). Management effectiveness evaluation of world cultural landscape heritage: a case from China. Heritage Science, 10(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00660-2
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.