Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Esta revista está autorizada por una licencia de atribución Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International. Para las licencias CC, el principio es el de la libertad creativa. Este sistema complementa el derecho de autor sin oponerse a este, conscientes de su importancia en nuestra cultura. El contenido de los artículos es responsabilidad de cada autor y no compromete, de ninguna manera, a la revista o a la institución. Se permite la divulgación y reproducción de títulos, resúmenes y contenido total, con fines académicos, científicos, culturales, siempre y cuando, se cite la respectiva fuente. Esta obra no puede ser utilizada con fines comerciales.
La revista no cobra a los autores por la presentación o la publicación de sus artículos
Resumen
El propósito de esta investigación es determinar el impacto de las mujeres consejeras que pertenecen a la junta directiva en el desempeño de la empresa. Este estudio empleó una técnica de muestreo intencional con una muestra de investigación compuesta por 264 empresas no financieras que cotizan en la Bolsa de Valores de Indonesia entre 2013 y 2019. Como sustitutos de la variable independiente de mujeres en las salas de juntas, este estudio examina la presencia de directoras, una variable ficticia para directoras ejecutivas, la proporción de directoras y la capacidad empresarial de las directoras. El rendimiento de los activos (ROA), el rendimiento del capital (ROE) y la Q de Tobin son indicadores para medir el desempeño corporativo. La técnica de análisis de este estudio es el análisis de regresión robusta. Según los resultados, las mujeres miembros de las juntas directivas tuvieron la mayor influencia en el desempeño de la empresa. En general, la variable ficticia de la directora ejecutiva sirve como indicador de la solidez del desempeño de la empresa.
Palabras clave:
Citas
Abebe, M. A., Li, P., Acharya, K., & Daspit, J. J. (2020). The founder chief executive officer: A review of current insights and directions for future research. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28(6), 406-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12348
Abdullah, H. O., & AL-Abrrow, H. (2023). Predicting positive and negative behaviors at the workplace: Insights from multi-faceted perceptions and attitudes. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 42(4), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22179
Ali Gull, A., Hussain, N., Akbar Khan, S., Nadeem, M. & Mansour Zalata, A. (2023). Walking the talk? A corporate governance perspective on corporate social responsibility decoupling. British Journal of Management, 34(4), 2186-2211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12695
Alkebsee, R. H., Habib, A., Huang, H. J., & Tian, G. (2022). The gender-diverse audit committee and audit report lag: Evidence from China. International Journal of Auditing, 26(2), 314-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12278
Baranchuk, N., & Dybvig, P. (2009). Consensus in diverse corporate boards. Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 715-747. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn052
Bezemer, P.-J., Pugliese, A., Nicholson, G., & Zattoni, A. (2023). Toward a synthesis of the board-strategy relationship: A literature review and future research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(1), 178-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12481
Bhat, K. U., Chen, Y., Jebran, K., & Memon, Z. A. (2019). Board diversity and corporate risk: Evidence from China. Corporate Governance, 20(2), 280-293. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2019-0001
Cambrea, D. R., Paolone, F., & Cucari, N. (2023). Advisory or monitoring role in ESG scenario: Which women directors are more influential in the Italian context? Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4299-4314. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3366
Cordeiro, J. J., Profumo, G., & Tutore, I. (2020). Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of family and dual‐class majority ownership structures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1127-1144. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2421
Cornelissen, J. P., Akemu, O., Jonkman, J. G. F., & Werner, M. D. (2021). Building character: The formation of a hybrid organizational identity in a social enterprise. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1294-1330. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12640
Doan, T., & Iskandar-Datta, M. (2020). Are female top executives more risk-averse or more ethical? Evidence from corporate cash holdings policy. Journal of Empirical Finance, 55, 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.11.005
Eide, A. E., Saether, E. A., & Aspelund, A. (2020). An investigation of leaders’ motivation, intellectual leadership, and sustainability strategy in relation to Norwegian manufacturers’ performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120053, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120053
Gordini, N., & Rancati, E. (2017). Gender diversity in the Italian boardroom and firm financial performance. Management Research Review, 40(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2016-0039
Gould, J. A., Kulik, C. T., & Sardeshmukh, S. R. (2018). Trickle-down effect: the impact of female board members on executive gender diversity. Human Resources Management, 57(4), 931-945. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21907
Greene, D., Intintoli, V. J., & Kahle, K. M. (2020). Do board gender quotas affect firm value? Evidence from California senate bill no. 826. Journal of Corporate Finance, 60, 101526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101526
Greiner, M., Kim, J., & Thor, J.C. (2023). Narcissistic CEOs and their corporate political activity. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113930
Gyapong, E., Ahmed, A., Ntim, C. G. & Nadeem M. (2019). Board gender diversity and dividend policy in australian listed firms: The effect of ownership concentration. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(2), 603-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09672-2
Hatane, S. E., Supangat, S., Tarigan, J., & Jie, F. (2019). Does internal corporate governance mechanism control firm risk? Evidence from Indonesia’s three high-risk sectors. Corporate Governance, 19(6), 1362-1376. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2019-0071
Hoang, T., Suh, J., & Sabharwal, M. (2022). Beyond a numbers game? Impact of diversity and inclusion on the perception of organizational justice. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 537-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13463
Islam, R., French, E., & Ali, M. (2022). Evaluating board diversity and its importance in the environmental and social performance of organizations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1134-1145. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2259
Issa, A., & Bensalem, N. (2023). Are gender-diverse boards eco-innovative? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(2), 742-754. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2385
Issa, A., & Zaid, M. A. A. (2023). Firm's biodiversity initiatives disclosure and board gender diversity: A multi-country analysis of corporations operating in Europe. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32((7), 4991-5007. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3404
Issa, A., Zaid, M. A. A., & Hanaysha, J. R. (2022). Exploring the relationship between female director's profile and sustainability performance: Evidence from the Middle East. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(6), 1980-2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3503
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818789
Kauff, M., Asbrock, F., & Schmid, K. (2020). Pro-diversity beliefs and intergroup relations. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(2), 269-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1853377
Kim, D., & Starks, L. T. (2016). Gender diversity on corporate boards: Do women contribute unique skills? American Economic Reviews, 106(5), 267-271. http://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161032
Kong, G., Kong, T.D., Qin, N., & Yu, L. (2022). Ethnic diversity, trust, and corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of marketization and language. Journal of Business Ethics, 187, 449-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05236-5
Knyazeva, A., Knyazeva, D., & Masulis, R.W. (2013). The supply of corporate directors and board independence. Review of Financial Studies, 26(6), 1561-1605. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hht020
Lassoued, N., & Khanchel, I. (2023). Voluntary CSR disclosure and CEO narcissism: The moderating role of CEO duality and board gender diversity. Review of Managerial Science, 17, 1075-1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00555-3
Lee, H. W., Choi, J. N., & Kim, S. (2018). Does gender diversity help teams constructively manage status conflict? An evolutionary perspective of status conflict, team psychological safety, and team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144, 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.09.005
Lee, S., Jeon, S., & Lee, B. (2019). Security controls for employees’ satisfaction: Perspective of controls framework. SAGE Open, 9(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019853908
Love, I., Nikolaev, B. & Dhakal, C. (2023). The well-being of women entrepreneurs: the role of gender inequality and gender roles. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00769-z
Magrelli, V., Rondi, E., De Massis, A., & Kotlar, J. (2020). Generational brokerage: An intersubjective perspective on managing temporal orientations in family firm succession. Strategic Organization, 20(1), 164-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020976972
Martínez-Alonso, R., Martínez-Romero, M. J., & Rojo-Ramírez A. A. (2020). Refining the influence of family involvement in management on firm performance: The mediating role of technological innovation efficiency. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 25(4), 337-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420957330
Mishra, A., & Müller, C. L. (2022). Robust regression with compositional covariates. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 165, 107315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2021.107315
Mohsen Al-Absy, M.S. (2023). Impactful women directors and earnings management. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2148873
Pandey, N., Andres, C., & Kumar, S. (2023). Mapping the corporate governance scholarship: Current state and future directions. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(1), 127-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12444
Porcena, Y.-R., Parboteeah, K. P., & Mero, N. P. (2021). Diversity and firm performance: Role of corporate ethics. Management Decision, 59(11), 2620-2644. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2019-0142
Reino, A., Roigas, K., & Müürsepp, M. (2020). Connections between organizational culture and financial performance in Estonian service and production companies. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(3), 375-393. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-01-2019-0017
Roque, A., Moreira, J. M., Dias Figueiredo, J., Albuquerque, R., & Gonçalves, H. (2020). Ethics beyond leadership: can ethics survive bad leadership? Journal of Global Responsibility, 11(3), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-06-2019-0065
Safiullah, Md., Akhter, T., Saona, P., Azad, Md.A.K. (2022). Gender diversity on corporate boards, firm performance, and risk-taking: New evidence from Spain. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 35, 100721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100721
Sanchez-Marin, G., Lozano-Reina, G., Baixauli-Soler, J. S., & Lucas-Perez, M.E. (2017). Say on pay effectiveness, corporate governance mechanisms, and CEO compensation alignment. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 20(4), 226-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2017.07.001
Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., & Maestripieri, D. (2009). Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(36), 15268-15273. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907352106
Solomon, S. J., Bendickson, J. S., Marvel, M. R., McDowell, W. C., & Mahto, R. (2021). Agency theory and entrepreneurship: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Business Research, 122, 466-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.003
Song, H. J., Yoon, Y. N., & Kang, K. H. (2020). The relationship between board diversity and firm performance in the lodging industry: The moderating role of internationalization. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86, 102461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102461
Teodosio, J., Vieira, E., & Madaleno, M. (2021). Gender diversity and corporate risk-taking: A literature review. Managerial Finance, 47(7) 1038-1073. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-11-2019-0555
Tran, H., & Turkiela, J. (2020). The powers that be: Concentration of authority within the board of directors and variability in firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 60, 101537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101537
Valenti, A., & Horner, S. (2020). The human capital of boards of directors and innovation: An empirical examination of the pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(06). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919620500565
Wang, S., & Lv, J. (2023). CEO-TMT faultline and corporate green innovation: The contextual role of Confucian culture. Managerial and Decision Economics, 44(8), 4422-4438. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3959
Xie, L., Zhou, J., Zong, Q., & Lu, Q. (2020). Gender diversity in R&D teams and innovation efficiency: Role of the innovation context. Research Policy, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103885
Yan, X., Wang, X., & Sheng Liu. (2023). A U-shaped relationship between real financialization and financial risk: Evidence from a single threshold model. Finance Research Letters, 56, 104017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104017
Zirgulis, A., Huettinger, & M. Misiunas, D. (2021). No woman, no aggressive tax planning? A study on CEO gender and effective tax rates in the Lithuanian retail sector. Review of Behavioral Finance, 14(3), 394 - 409. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-09-2020-0232